Most Americans Are Clueless on Cost of Their Financial Products

Select Group of Financial Services Firms Perform Well on Investor Wants and Pricing Clarity Metrics

(Rye, NY) – Most Americans believe they pay nothing for their financial products – or have no idea what they pay – according to a new study by Hearts & Wallets, the source for retail investor data and insights.

Wants & Pricing: What Investors Buy & Competitive Ratings reveals Americans continue to be in the dark about one of the most important aspects of their personal finances. About one-third (31%) say don’t know what they pay for their financial products, an increase of four percentage point in one year. Less than one-third (28%) say for certain they are charged a fee by a retail financial “store.” (Hearts & Wallets defines “stores” as retail and defined contribution providers that work directly with investors.) Of the 41% who say they pay their financial store “nothing” and instead pay through actual products, a whopping 72% say they pay nothing for the product.

“Everyone knows nothing is free in life,” Laura Varas, founder and CEO of Hearts & Wallets, said. “When you add together the Americans who say they don’t know what they pay for their financial products, and the high number of people who say they pay nothing for products that they obtain through their retail financial stores, we have a major problem. Consumers should know what they pay. Some consumers want to pay more for things they want, such as higher service levels, while others do not. The industry has a responsibility to price clearly, and should embrace price clarity enthusiastically by laying out the different choices available to consumers. Regulation has a role, but in the end, there’s no substitute for an informed consumer.”

Clear pricing and trust

Pricing is one aspect of trust. Understanding how a firm earns money is the No. 1 trust driver within the control of a financial services firm. Only 1 in 5 consumers has a clear understanding of the incentives of their providers, a figure that has not improved year to year. “Competition will force traditional financial services firms to confront the pricing issue,” Varas said. “Robo-advisors and other new fintech entrants are explaining pricing clearly and pushing others in the marketplace to do the same.”

Among traditional firms, self-service outperforms other categories in customer “understanding how firms earns money,” with Scottrade  (34% agree or strongly agree) and TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ: AMTD), at the top. USAA, E*Trade (NASDAQ: ETFC), Charles Schwab (NASDAQ: SCHW) and Edward Jones have 25%+ customers who rate their understanding very high.

Top 10 “wants”

In the study, over 5,000 U.S. households ranked their top 10 “wants” in their financial services providers. All lifestages and income groups are becoming more demanding. At the national level, the top 3 most important attributes are “fees clear and understandable” (56%), “is unbiased, puts my interests first” (54%), and “explains things in understandable terms” (54%). About half of investors are highly price-sensitive and want providers to have “low fees” (54%) or at least “fees that are reasonable for the service provided” (53%).

Mass market (under $100,000 in investable assets) and millennials grew more demanding in all dimensions. Post-retirees became more demanding in access and reliability attributes. High net worth clients ($2 million-plus) are more relaxed, notably on “has Internet account access” and “wide variety of products,” which are becoming must-haves that are no longer competitive differentiators.

“To differentiate services, providers should determine which distinct market segments they want to address,” Varas said. “For example, people close to retirement are more anxious, so the reliability service dimension of ‘is unbiased, puts my interests first’ is much higher than for a millennial.”

Who’s the leader

Consumers identified and ranked the top one or two firms they use on 27 attributes in six service dimensions. The study focuses on the top 24 big banks, brokerages and mutual fund firms most often cited by participants. Edward Jones performs at or near the top of 24 firms on over 10 different attributes. Wells Fargo Advisors (part of Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) Enterprise), Scottrade and USAA are top performers on five or more attributes. Ameriprise Financial (NYSE: AMP), Charles Schwab, T. Rowe Price, TD Ameritrade, Prudential (NYSE: PRU), LPL (NASDAQ: LPLA), Vanguard and Capital One (NYSE: COF) lead in at least one or more attributes.

  • On “fees clear and understandable” – Scottrade, Edward Jones and Wells Fargo Advisors are the best performers, each with 60% or more of their customers giving them top marks.
  • Edward Jones, USAA, Ameriprise and Wells Fargo Advisors are top performers on “unbiased, puts my interests first” and “explains things in understandable terms.” LPL also does well on “unbiased.”
  • Scottrade, in particular, made big improvements this year, notably in “well-trained staff,” “investment ideas are knowledgeable, timely and tactical,” “offers personal financial advice,” and “online tools and research.”
  • “Has made me money” is one reason why customers go to full-service firms. 65% of customers of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), LPL and Edward Jones give it high importance, compared to only 39% of E*Trade “Offers personal financial advice” is most important to customers of Edward Jones (54%), but much less so at Vanguard (28%) customers, who focus more on pricing.

For complete data on this study or the firm’s other research, contact Hearts & Wallets.

Click here to download a PDF version of this release.

More ‘Anxious’ Male Investors Going It Alone: Study

Hearts and Wallets featured in Ignites article
By Matthew Beaton

Nervous male investors are shunning financial advisors in greater numbers, with little interest in receiving professional advice on their workplace retirement money even after they quit their jobs, new Hearts & Wallets research shows.

About a third of U.S. households were “anxious” about their finances in 2015. Of the men who feel this way, 78% said they were self-directed compared to 62% in 2010, according to the Rye, N.Y.-based research and consulting firm. By comparison, men “highly confident” in their investment talents have remained at about the same self-directed level (75%) since 2010… Read More (login or free trial required)

Consumers ‘Crave Trust,’ Concerned DOL Fiduciary Rule Won’t Provide It


research and resources for the financial industry

Focus groups found rule is good ‘in theory,’ but consumers don’t trust government regulations

The effect of the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule on investors’ trust in the financial services industry may be limited, as they don’t believe the government can be trusted any more than financial professionals, according to a report released by Hearts & Wallets.

Hearts & Wallets conducted six national focus groups with people who use financial advisors and those who don’t. Participants listened to highlights of the rule that included text from the proposal, and possible impacts as reported by the DOL, Morningstar, United Capital, Pershing, Cerulli and Investopedia. The report identified four main concerns among the respondents.

“In theory, they thought that [the rule] was a good idea,” Laura Varas, CEO and founder of Hearts & Wallets, told ThinkAdvisor on Thursday.

Some participants said they would be unlikely to hire any advisor who didn’t have a fiduciary responsibility to serve their clients’ best interests because they’ve had bad interactions with advisors before, but Varas said that particularly among participants who don’t work with a professional, “They crave trust and they hoped that the fiduciary standard could create trust.”… Read More